I agree. Its not earth shattering.
Results: A total of 220,517 subjects were included in the analysis; 133,051 (60.3%) ivermectin users and 87,466 (39.7%) non-users. COVID-19 infection occurred in 4,311 (3.2%) treated subjects, and 3,034 (3.5%) non-treated subjects. This evidence showed a 7% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate with use of ivermectin: COVID-19 infection rate ratio (Risk ratio (RR) of 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89 – 0.98; p = 0.003). A total of 62 deaths (1.4% mortality rate) occurred among users and 79 deaths (2.6% mortality rate) among non-users, showing a 48% reduction in mortality rate (RR, 0,52; 95%CI, 0.37 – 0.72; p = 0.0001). Risk of dying from COVID-19 among ivermectin users was 45% lower than non-users (RR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.40 – 0.77; p = 0.0004).
Thanks. It looks like they under dosed, and by not including zinc in the study they’re only fighting half the battle. The Ivermectin docks at the same receptors as the spike and introduces the zinc into the cell which creates a ph imbalance that the corona doesn’t like as it prevents replication of the virus and spike. Further, vitamin D and other vitamins and minerals should be included to help regulate the immune system to help fight off a virus. Pretty simplified, but that is my understanding.
(post is archived)