There has never been a safety and efficacy study done for these boosters and the original study of the safety and efficacy for the first 2 jabs suggested that a booster wasn't necessary.
If the 1st study was wrong about the need for boosters, shouldn't we at least do another study to determine if a 3rd shot is safe?
There has never been a safety and efficacy study done for these boosters and the original study of the safety and efficacy for the first 2 jabs suggested that a booster wasn't necessary.
If the 1st study was wrong about the need for boosters, shouldn't we at least do another study to determine if a 3rd shot is safe?
(post is archived)