At some point it becomes obvious to even the most brainwashed that the government is pushing the shots to kill us.
At some point it becomes obvious to even the most brainwashed that the government is pushing the shots to kill us.
You are cherry picking. Right on VAERS it says that the data has not been verified and ANYONE can report a reaction with no proof that they even got the shot to begin with. That and you can't cite a CDC site for evidence against vaccination as the CDC recommends to get vaccinated. That's the fallacy of stolen concept. So in one swoop every time someone links VAERS to push anti vaccine rhetoric you are guilty of 2 logical fallacies. And even if the data was verified and there were 900,000 adverse reactions (most of which aren't fatal or cause long term issues). That would mean out of 440 million doses given in the US that a whopping .2% of people had any reaction and the severity of reactions get lower and lower. And that's being generous in saying all 900,000 reports are verified.
You are cherry picking. Right on VAERS it says that the data has not been verified and ANYONE can report a reaction with no proof that they even got the shot to begin with. That and you can't cite a CDC site for evidence against vaccination as the CDC recommends to get vaccinated. That's the fallacy of stolen concept. So in one swoop every time someone links VAERS to push anti vaccine rhetoric you are guilty of 2 logical fallacies. And even if the data was verified and there were 900,000 adverse reactions (most of which aren't fatal or cause long term issues). That would mean out of 440 million doses given in the US that a whopping .2% of people had any reaction and the severity of reactions get lower and lower. And that's being generous in saying all 900,000 reports are verified.
VAERS is merely an indicator. The fact that there are more reports than normal tells me there is something worth investigating.
The end result of that investigation may reveal the truth to be different than the perception provided by the VAERS data alone, but the fact that more reports than normal exist tells me that more investigation is necessary to find out why.
You can't take the raw data and use it without knowing why the data changed. That's the thing no one is ever going to look at, at least not until something catastrophic happens.
VAERS is merely an indicator. The fact that there are more reports than normal tells me there is something worth investigating.
The end result of that investigation may reveal the truth to be different than the perception provided by the VAERS data alone, but the fact that more reports than normal exist tells me that more investigation is necessary to find out why.
You can't take the raw data and use it without knowing why the data changed. That's the thing no one is ever going to look at, at least not until something catastrophic happens.
(post is archived)