until standards improve and we can afford universal healthcare leave well enough alone.
Universal healthcare leads to worse service and way more mandatory shit than ever. Why the hell would you want "universal healthcare"? I guess some people love slavery.
Universal healthcare is more efficient financially and can provide superior care.
Pretending the american system is better doesn't really work when pharmaceutical companies and their for profit schemes and insurance companies jewing everybody are daily occurrences right in our faces.
Both systems have drawbacks but if it's state run corporate tyranny can't be enfranchised so easily.
Step one of affording universal healthcare: deport all niggers.
>Both systems have drawbacks but if it's state run corporate tyranny can't be enfranchised so easily.
I have heard that the CDC and the FDA are funded by the pharma industry.
I don't know the solution, but it seems to me that trading big business for big gubmint doesn't really work either. I wouldn't mind universal health care, or the tax bill associated with it, IF we could actually trust our gubmint to run anything properly.
This is generally my position, no meaningful reforms can happen in this country without first cleaning house. Jews must be exiled at least. Negroes and quadroons must be sent to africa or haiti, paying them to leave is fine by me(it will prevent white deaths) but if were doing that lets send them all to africa and try to get all countries to do the same. Spend the next decade revoking legal status of all spics and non whites not born here 9n tye basis that previous governments had to steal elections and never had public support for the immigration policies, revert our immigration laws to only allow whites of good character and invite the white world to america specifically sett up a white refuge program for boers, in the interest of saving white lives we let sleeping dogs lie in the US and allow white passing minorities and non chinese(CCP on their passport) asians to stay.
In that scenario there is no question in my mind about the efficiency of state options shining through.
Universal healthcare is more efficient financially and can provide superior care.
What? That's the sale pitch, not the reality.
Look at quality of life in europe compared to the US, I admit freely there are some major differences like racial composition helping to make it more efficient but europe has much better pay rates on average, a longer average life span by about 5 years for men and because of universal medicine they don't get unnecessary procedures or visits pushed for profit. Even now there medical systems are recoiling from the jabs while ours are mandating them.
I've traveled by road up and down the eastern seaboard and can freely compare privately held sections of highway, public highways and those under public-private partnership and the public highways have the best design and quality because their design is focused exclusively on the common good and not receiving a toll or abetting their investors financial endeavors and they are required to be maintained by maintained by law no safety waivers are given to the public, private roads are always shit because the bare minimum is done to maintain the road while all planning is focused on driving traffic to take breaks at investor's businesses, the public-private roads have the hyper efficiencies design and construction of public roads but all used for the purpose of making you miserable and want to pull over into the shit tier state sponsored gas and food co-op.
Most hospitals today are the public private partnership sort where you get the worst of both worlds because the corporate entity can wield the state as a crutch exclusively for it's own interests, the totally private hospitals of my youth though miserly were quite efficient mostly because of the human element, and the universal healthcare I've witnessed first hand in travels has been basically as simple as going to a doc in a box fast med joint but without paying more than 15 bucks and they actually prescribe you something and give you helpful advice.
State options get a bad rep because we only hear about the worst examples from politicians being bribed by medical companies. The full state option would be better for the common man than public-private partnerships we have now if only a little and I freely admit that the old completely private system was really great but that died over 20 years ago and the closest affordable option for most today are brazen scams.
Just like with the post office a truly public option doesn't preclude private enterprises from success.
Tell that to anyone who’s been to the VA, it’s just a big money pit with substandard care.
That's because the kikes who run it hate vets, the VA is also inefficient in part because of its exclusivity and its competition with market based medicine.
Essentially they can't keep great doctors and nurses because there is a better paying gig in town.
He’s apparently never been to the VA. I’ll take private any day.
(post is archived)