"covid rate" has no meaning because it is recorded in a horrible way with no context. PCR or antigen? if pcr, how many cycles? was it blanket testing or testing of sick people? error bars?
this is all on purpose, and i would say it is difficult to say with a high degree of certainty that there even is a "covid".
The point of the article, I think, is to note the rate of infections using the media's favorite metric to help dispel the notion that masks are effective. I could be wrong. I only skimmed it before posting it.
Yes, but it is letting them manipulate us to using their rules in our thinking; it is nonsense. It is similar to us talking about baking 6M cookies, there is no evidence at all of there even being mixing bowls or cookie ovens.
Ah, OK. Now I understand your point.
(post is archived)