Another example of a study where findings and headlines differ, in this case most likely not to please their sponsors but to get the funding for follow up studies.
We already know that the delayed and weak adaptive immune response is caused by the virus sending proteins into the nucleus of infected cells, where they suppress the gene expression needed to produce the stuff that alarms the immune system (and we know that ivermectin blocks the importer molecules used for that mechanism).
In the study, researchers have looked for virus proteins in the nucleus of infected cells and have found more than one virus protein in the nucleus, including parts of the spike protein. But then they looked at DNA repair instead of gene expression, most likely because that's what they can do best. DNA repair is quite uninteresting in a cell that is already doomed (either because it produces too many viruses or because a killer cell dissolves the infected cell and mops the mess up).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/v-d-j-recombination V(D)J recombination assembles immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes from the preexisting variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments by a cut and paste mechanism. Block V(D)J recombination, no new antibodies for new antigens. Blocks immune response. Spike mRNA GMO Jab blocking immune response could make bubble baby people.
But where does it happen? They could show that the nucleus of infected cells contains proteins from the virus. The mechanism how this happens and the importer molecules involved are known. Viruses do that to disable the self defence of infected cells.
I would be concerned if we would have hints that the virus can infect immune system cells without replicating, so the cells survive and maybe replicate with modified DNA.
I would be concerned if we would have hints that the vax mRNA or vax induced spike proteins can somehow enter the nucleus (maybe with the help of a virus) and these cells then somehow get not killed by the immune system.
All jab side effects can be explained by antibodies so far (for example, platelet activation triggered by antibodies). Most side effects get really strong after the second jab, when the immune system has learned to create antibodies fast and in huge numbers. It seems that the antibody quality control does not work very well in a simulated infection. I'm reluctant to accept more complicated theories as long as the simple ones hold water.
(post is archived)