I love the fact check; there truly isn’t enough of that, but…
..which means they haven't happened yet
I don’t agree; it 100% does not mean that. It means they didn’t release whether or not it had happened. It’s speculation on either side.
you can't put wild animals in a few acres and expect any of them to be happy.
Again, I don’t disagree, but at the same time you don’t expect three giraffes to drop dead within a month. I’m not saying it was the vac - especially the one that had a broken leg, but “age related issues” is awfully unspecific.
I don’t agree; it 100% does not mean that. It means they didn’t release whether or not it had happened. It’s speculation on either side.
true but if they announce they are going to do it they are also probably going to announce that they have done it. Free publicity. And I'd guess that organising that and finding supplies is going to take some time as they are prioritising pavement apes at the moment
but at the same time you don’t expect three giraffes to drop dead within a month.
It's reasonable to speculate that just two unexplained deaths (one was just an injury and later euthanised) where both were liver related, is more likely to be something they both ate and that it was specific to giraffes. "zoo is investigating possible exposure to a toxin or pathogen"
nobody on poal is an expert on giraffe pathology, despite what +10 people will claim in response to this post, a crab died too, but again it was just an injury caused by that giraffe that slipped on a slope
There was a zoo in UK where 57 of their 305 animals died in 2018. Zoos are just shitty places in general
This isn't the stupidest tinfoil bullshit on poal this week, but they are all to be found in the vax subforums, poal needs to get a grip
poal needs to get a grip
I can get on board with that. None here trust CNN for a reason; we should apply that same logic to all 'sources.'
poal needs to get a grip
maybe later. but not during NNN.
Isn't it NFN?
(post is archived)