So recently we've seen that the various measures of immunological strength for those who are vaccinted are steadily declining. That is A.I.D.S (aquired immuno deficiency syndrome).
If it's from HIV then yes. If your auto-immune disorder (IDS) is from something else - there are actually THOUSANDS of causes for an auto-immune disorder to present - then no, it's not AIDS, it's 'just' and auto-immune disorder. This one is particularly nefarious because it's 'sourced' from gene-editing. So there's no way to cure or manage it. Whereas with HIV's resultant auto-immune disorder (labeled as AIDS) it is extremely treatable and has an extremely low mortality rate if it's treated. And isn't that high if it's not.
getting AIDS
No and yes. They're developing an auto-immune disorder, which AIDS is. "AIDS" is just a pithy label for a symptom of HIV (the virus). AIDS isn't "a thing" on it's own. There isn't an "AIDS" cell like there is an HIV cell (a virus). There isn't a auto-immune cell but there is an auto-immune disorder.
What if it's actual HIV? From a depop position that would be ideal.
How in the fuck would that be ideal? HIV and it's resultant AIDS is completely manageable. Obesity is far more medically dangerous with a far far far higher mortality rate. Now, an untreatbale gene-editing caused auto-immune disorder then yes. But not "AIDS" (HIV).
...but you couldn't safely have sex with the vaxxed or even an unvaxxed in many cases because it would be sexually transmissible...
How on Earth would an unvaxxed spread a condition that requires a genetic modification? That isn't how sex works. Like at all, even a little bit. This thread has a good start but ends with pure judaism. That's sad.
gene-editing caused auto-immune disorder is HIV
No. False.
ungene-edited individuals can spread this gene-edited auto-immune disorder by sex
No. Fuck off.
HIV existed for decades before (((mRNA gene-editing))) but they're the same thing.
No. Stop.
(post is archived)