Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

366

So recently we've seen that the various measures of immunological strength for those who are vaccinted are steadily declining. That is A.I.D.S (aquired immuno deficiency syndrome). But here is the scary part. We have seen things self assemble in the vaccine. That's not that weird from a nature standpoint (isn't something that should going on in a vaccine though). Viruses are assembled from simple parts being in a common fluid. A cell generates all the various protines and basic structures and then they self assemble in the cytoplasm of the cell, and could do that in any fluid.

What if it's actual HIV? From a depop position that would be ideal. Not only would several billion die (the number of people who have taken a vaccine), which is already near scale of the general population, but you couldn't safely have sex with the vaxxed or even an unvaxxed in many cases because it would be sexually transmissible. You could shut down almost all reproduction. Even if you are currently married and are both unvaxxed and had children in this post-reproduction era, the number of dating options your child would have would be narrowed if the population is majorally HIV infected.

So recently we've seen that the various measures of immunological strength for those who are vaccinted are steadily declining. That is A.I.D.S (aquired immuno deficiency syndrome). But here is the scary part. We have seen things self assemble in the vaccine. That's not that weird from a nature standpoint (isn't something that should going on in a vaccine though). Viruses are assembled from simple parts being in a common fluid. A cell generates all the various protines and basic structures and then they self assemble in the cytoplasm of the cell, and could do that in any fluid. What if it's actual HIV? From a depop position that would be ideal. Not only would several billion die (the number of people who have taken a vaccine), which is already near scale of the general population, but you couldn't safely have sex with the vaxxed or even an unvaxxed in many cases because it would be sexually transmissible. You could shut down almost all reproduction. Even if you are currently married and are both unvaxxed and had children in this post-reproduction era, the number of dating options your child would have would be narrowed if the population is majorally HIV infected.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

That's basically what was predicted at the start, that these shots wrecked the immune system. Let's hope they can recover AND wake up to the truth.

[–] • 1 pt

The only info we have are from banned doctors and scientists. They claim killer T cells/cd8 are lowered in the vaxxed, they’re the front line of the immune system that prevent cancers and opportunistic infections BUT have remained stable for 10 months now) in aids, helper t kills/cd4 cells are effected and you can live a long time while those are being depleted but not with killer T/cd8 much more of a drop would be catastrophic.

I’ve seen multiple videos from doctors claiming the innate immune system is somewhat lowered but stabilized. They don’t know if it will go back up in times(10 months now) or if boosters will make it worse.

They’re seeing more aggressive cancers in the younger crowd and those that get regular checkups, herpes, advanced HPV, endometrial cancer and late stage melanoma for now in the young and those with regular checkups. Other things could start to show up as time goes by.

I think that’s why they’re holding off on boosters, they know the innate immune system is damaged and when people start dropping dead from cancers a few months after boosters they know the game is up.

2 minute video that covers it:

https://rumble.com/vlcypm-pathologist-ryan-n-cole-of-the-mayo-clinic-on-what-we-are-seeing-in-lab-res.html

Full video:

https://rumble.com/vlxpf0-ryan-cole-talks-about-vaccine-mandate.html

[–] • 0 pt

Anecdotal stuff I have seen from people around me leads me to believe that any inherent weakness is exposed by taking the vax. Clots, cancer, heart issues. All the people I have seen with these issues have a family history of it but they are having to deal with it at a much earlier age.

[–] • 0 pt

Anecdotal stuff I have seen from people around me leads me to believe that any inherent weakness is exposed by taking the vax. Clots, cancer, heart issues. All the people I have seen with these issues have a family history of it but they are having to deal with it at a much earlier age.

I haven’t seen much myself and I'm starting to look like a nut.

I know people who have been hurt directly after the shot though who don’t have a family history of those things.

Since the video from the scientists and doctors are claiming it’s lowered it would be natural that those predisposed or have hereditary conditions would have them showing up first as it would take longer for the healthy to develop them.

My GF’s and her best friend work together and about three months after taking the jab she got tremors in her arms and hands whenever she grasps/grips something.

It’s hereditary though since all the women on her moms side get it AFTER menopause it starts with the arms and hand then the neck/ head. But this girl is in her lower 30’s so it started 15-20 years early for her. And she’s ready for the second jab even though her husband told her not to get the first one and definitely not the booster.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I doubt it for one big reason... as a society we have a lot of infrastructure, process and habits in place to detect HIV. The NWO would not risk the entire plan on a bet that no one will get a a HIV test.

I think it is looking more and more every day that the jab does cause immune problems but its not HIV... it is something that is not classified by the current medical establishment

[–] • 0 pt

we have a lot of infrastructure, process and habits in place to detect HIV

And that's exactly with one of the vaccine prototypes.

It would seem they could make a virus very similar to HIV that would evade detection by standard HIV tests. There already exist (very expensive) drugs that allegedly allow you to have sex with an HIV positive person and not catch it. There also exists (very expensive) drug cocktails that allow HIV positive people to live a seeming normal life.

There is an unexplainable zeal with which this vaccine is being pushed. It has nothing to do with improving the health of society at large given the current studies. If the elites wanted to eliminate the population but selective keep an amount of engineers, tradesmen, and other workers then having them beholden to their health insurance to pay for these expensive meds would be a good way to keep them in line. Epstein's pals could also participate in all their desired sick behavior as well assuming they took the necessary pills beforehand.

[–] • 1 pt

yeah, all I was saying is that it is not just simple HIV in the jab. Something that has the same end outcome? Maybe... but actual HIV would be discovered too quickly.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

So recently we've seen that the various measures of immunological strength for those who are vaccinted are steadily declining. That is A.I.D.S (aquired immuno deficiency syndrome).

If it's from HIV then yes. If your auto-immune disorder (IDS) is from something else - there are actually THOUSANDS of causes for an auto-immune disorder to present - then no, it's not AIDS, it's 'just' and auto-immune disorder. This one is particularly nefarious because it's 'sourced' from gene-editing. So there's no way to cure or manage it. Whereas with HIV's resultant auto-immune disorder (labeled as AIDS) it is extremely treatable and has an extremely low mortality rate if it's treated. And isn't that high if it's not.

getting AIDS

No and yes. They're developing an auto-immune disorder, which AIDS is. "AIDS" is just a pithy label for a symptom of HIV (the virus). AIDS isn't "a thing" on it's own. There isn't an "AIDS" cell like there is an HIV cell (a virus). There isn't a auto-immune cell but there is an auto-immune disorder.

What if it's actual HIV? From a depop position that would be ideal.

How in the fuck would that be ideal? HIV and it's resultant AIDS is completely manageable. Obesity is far more medically dangerous with a far far far higher mortality rate. Now, an untreatbale gene-editing caused auto-immune disorder then yes. But not "AIDS" (HIV).

...but you couldn't safely have sex with the vaxxed or even an unvaxxed in many cases because it would be sexually transmissible...

How on Earth would an unvaxxed spread a condition that requires a genetic modification? That isn't how sex works. Like at all, even a little bit. This thread has a good start but ends with pure judaism. That's sad.

gene-editing caused auto-immune disorder is HIV

No. False.

ungene-edited individuals can spread this gene-edited auto-immune disorder by sex

No. Fuck off.

HIV existed for decades before (((mRNA gene-editing))) but they're the same thing.

No. Stop.

[–] • 0 pt

but you couldn't safely have sex with the vaxxed or even an unvaxxed in many cases because it would be sexually transmissible. You could shut down almost all reproduction.

This would imply it actually comes out that the vaccine gave people HIV. Which would cause a mass revolt.

How ever you could "conspiracy theory" the truth out there, so the same portion who never took the vax are the same people who now know to avoid the vaxxed like the literal plague.

Have you seen ShadowGate? It's pretty fucking important if you haven't. It says they take all of our data collected through the patriot act, then they make ultra targeted propaganda / culture campaigns against groups they found to be of certain demographics, using AI to find certain people.

It's how they got massive colossal marches for anti free speech, BLM etc. They ultra targeted the found to be radicalizable "left" and then got almost all that harvest to get out into marches etc.

WHAT IF (no what if's, they're doing it) they are doing the same to the right, but to ie make sure non of them take the vax? Then ie they force the remainers to take the vax by forcing them out of a job or worse later, but at this stage all of vaxs on the shelves are ie AIDS?

So they targeted ie Trump supporters, freedom supporters, found with their ShadowGate "tech", did an ultra focused campaign to scare them into not taking it, then switch out the vax with a deadly version at the same time they force the remainers (mostly Trump / freedom supporters by this time) to take it by forcing them out of a job otherwise?

[–] • 1 pt

Simple solution: you win the game, by not playing. This is a very serious meme: https://pic8.co/sh/yetg75.jpg

[–] • 0 pt

There are plenty of jobs to do that are not subject to the OSHA mandate.

It will be denial of access to grocery stores and medical facilities that will push holdouts to get jabbed.