Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

568

The researchers found that among more than 600,000 veterans, J&J's vaccine's protection fell from 88% in March to 3% in August. Meanwhile, Moderna's vaccine protection against infection fell to 64% from 92%, and Pfizer's declined to 50% from 91% during that same time period.

>The researchers found that among more than 600,000 veterans, J&J's vaccine's protection fell from 88% in March to 3% in August. Meanwhile, Moderna's vaccine protection against infection fell to 64% from 92%, and Pfizer's declined to 50% from 91% during that same time period.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

“ J&J is a very good vaccine. I also believe it's probably a two-shot vaccine," said Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health. "It's really urgent that people get that second shot pretty quickly. "Probably one is not enough. And everybody who has had one needs a second one two months after the first. They are going to get full protection if they do that," he said.”

Probably probably, fuck any doctor who says probably.

[–] • 1 pt

From the CDC's

The J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine was 66.3% effective

Now they're saying some other "research" put it 88% in March. At least they are making it obvious that their numbers should be trusted.

[–] • 0 pt

You mean should not be trusted?

[–] • 1 pt

Bears tends to be sarcastic, birds not so much.

[–] • 0 pt

It's not so much birds are or are not sarcastic, it's just that I'm stupid.