Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

They claimed using fetal stem cells was a “professed beliefs” to be “personal moral choices and/or conscientious objections rather than a tenet of a religious faith.” OHSU also states that “receiving another vaccine in the last five years” is “past behavior that may disqualify an individual from receiving a religious exception.”

I believe close to every medical and religious exemption was denied.

Announcement:

https://lc.org/newsroom/details/101121-oregon-health-illegally-questions-religious-beliefs-1

Letter of demand:

https://lc.org/101121LtrOHSUReUnlawfulDenialsofReligiousExceptions_Redacted.pdf

At this point I’ll have to see how this turns out and if the company receives a lot of funding from the feds, it’s really strict criteria but the more they lose they less strict the can be hopefully.

If they lose and have to reinstate everyone from unpaid leave it will be a tough choice between telling your sincerely held beliefs or using this template from

https://pic8.co/sh/R6ST5m.jpeg

https://pic8.co/i/1d41a5d9-4311-40c6-ae68-d11f84f98044/

Original thread:

https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/446167

Thanks everyone for your help!! And all the people who mentioned liberty counsel months ago and the person in the recent thread who mentioned ViviBarnesLaw. I met a few others from ohsu who were denied, they never responded but I told them to contact liberty counsel along with my friend, maybe they did.

They claimed using fetal stem cells was a **“professed beliefs” to be “personal moral choices and/or conscientious objections rather than a tenet of a religious faith.” OHSU also states that “receiving another vaccine in the last five years” is “past behavior that may disqualify an individual from receiving a religious exception.**” I believe close to every medical and religious exemption was denied. Announcement: https://lc.org/newsroom/details/101121-oregon-health-illegally-questions-religious-beliefs-1 Letter of demand: https://lc.org/101121LtrOHSUReUnlawfulDenialsofReligiousExceptions_Redacted.pdf At this point I’ll have to see how this turns out and if the company receives a lot of funding from the feds, it’s really strict criteria but the more they lose they less strict the can be hopefully. If they lose and have to reinstate everyone from unpaid leave it will be a tough choice between telling your sincerely held beliefs or using this template from @native https://pic8.co/sh/R6ST5m.jpeg https://pic8.co/i/1d41a5d9-4311-40c6-ae68-d11f84f98044/ Original thread: https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/446167 Thanks everyone for your help!! And all the people who mentioned liberty counsel months ago and the person in the recent thread who mentioned ViviBarnesLaw. I met a few others from ohsu who were denied, they never responded but I told them to contact liberty counsel along with my friend, maybe they did.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] • 1 pt

I forgot this part:

see also EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. 768 (2015) (same). Title VII defines “religion” as “all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief.” 42 U.S.C. §2000e(j) (emphasis added). Moreover, as the EEOC has made clear, Title VII’s protections also extend to nonreligious beliefs if related to morality, ultimate ideas about life, purpose, and death. See EEOC, Questions and Answers: Religious Discrimination in the Workplace (July 22, 2008), https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions- and-answers-religious-discrimination-workplace