WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

389

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It is so much worse than this.

But again, look at the total number of doses, the total number of participants, compare that to the general population. Why is this so fucking hard for people to understand? Numbers without context are meaningless. What would be the total number of deaths among the general population for an equal sample size?

It’s a much stronger argument to continue to point out that they are hiding the actual numbers. That’s a much, much stronger argument. Even more compelling is that we have data that shows, truly shows, that the vaccinations don’t work, could actually make things worse, and that we do not know what the long-term side effects are going to be and have barely even studied it. Those are much stronger arguments.

Because the data gleaned from these reporting structures continuously show a lower mortality rate among vaccinated than the general population! Why do people not grasp that? You and I all know that’s bullshit, which means they are hiding the real numbers or we are wrong.

While these thousands are dying after getting vaccinated there are thousands that are dying who were never vaccinated. How did the numbers compare apples to apples? Because over and over again, these reporting sites and tracking tables are showing a lower or equal mortality rate to the unvaxxed population.

When there are literally thousands of people dying every day, without showing a direct comparison between the vaxxed and unvaxxed populations, these numbers are completely 100% meaningless.

The better arguments to make is that there’s absolutely no significant benefit to receiving these jabs, they are worthless and therefore even a tiny risk is reckless, they are hiding real death numbers and that WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE LONGTERM SIDE EFFECTS WILL BE.

Throwing numbers against the wall that actually hurt our argument is a complete waste of time.