By october 15th the cancer causing side effect increase will be more emerging in statistics
No it won't. This is definitely among the most retarded talking points even cooked up about the mRNA vaccines.
Hint: cancer is from mutated DNA. There is literally not pathway for an mRNA vaccine to cause cancer.
There are other pervasive pseudoscience arguments being made about the mRNA vaccines and causing cancer. Such as "the mRNA vaccines suppress certain proteins which prevented certain types of cancer." That one was false because it was basing it off of a study from 2018 when these mRNA vaccines didn't exist for this:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9994785135
WRONG!
Are you uneducated in science?
Are you a new account paid jew leftist disenchanting SHILL?
I explained the exact mechanism in other similar comments the same night here.
You are obviously uneducated in oncology, if you do not know that T-Cells stave off cancer. Maybe you were educated in the 1960s, but in 2021 its well established science that SOME CANCERS like the one I stipulated, are well regulated by the efforts of certain T-cells.
Immuno-oncologists have discovered that T-cells also seek and destroy cancer cells all the time, which keeps the body in a state of equilibrium.
I ignored all your writing, and I am sorry if you might have addressed my remarks, I read a comment as one single blink image, and my mind focused solely on your claim that I erred. I am never incorrect in any post I made on this site.
Feel free to find a mistake if you can. You failed this time.
Your tactic of trying to correct me in matters of science or medicine is comical to me and indicative of a classic ADL / SPLC / JIDF / ShareBlue attack method to run-off educated users from "free speech hate sites"
Read some papers or books on Immuno-oncology, join up with modern established science.
Are you uneducated in science?
Clearly not. Since I do science and statistics for a living. You, on the other hand, are quite full of disinformation, you're an idiot, and you're definitely full of shit.
Notice how your lengthy reply, which clearly indicates you have mental problems (getting some schizophrenia vibes from you), contains not a shred of real science in it at all? Just a mish-mash of pseudoscience.
Viruses are known to cause cancer. Reverse-transcribing DNA with RNA through reverse-Transciptase is known to happen. Not saying, that THIS PARTICULAR mRNA shot does the same.
Furthermore, the clot-shot is supposed to damage some people's immune system, which in turn makes them more prone to cancer. Identifying and disposing of cancer cells is one of its functions, after all.
Correct (Immuno-oncology) : T-Cells keeping back many forms of cancer, especially anal cancer, and cervical cancer. And the mRNA jabbed are missing 40% of the types of T-Cells that hunt down aberrant DNA cells. I mention it in another more detailed post and erred in this thread by not being pedantic on the topic of :
Immuno-oncology
I am more detailed in my cancer prediction in :
https://poal.co/s/News/437982/283c8303-5b92-4271-a902-a67e785c156a
Viruses are known to cause cancer.
And here is how:
"When viruses cause an infection, they spread their DNA, affecting healthy cells’ genetic makeup and potentially causing them to turn into cancer."
https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2017/08/how-can-a-virus-cause-cancer
Reverse-transcribing DNA with RNA through reverse-Transciptase is known to happen. Not saying, that THIS PARTICULAR mRNA shot does the same.
That's not how mRNA vaccines work at all.
"RNA vaccines work by introducing an mRNA sequence (the molecule which tells cells what to build) which is coded for a disease specific antigen, once produced within the body, the antigen is recognised by the immune system, preparing it to fight the real thing."
https://www.phgfoundation.org/briefing/rna-vaccines
Furthermore, the clot-shot is supposed to damage some people's immune system
Wrong. That's not how mRNA vaccines work at all.
which in turn makes them more prone to cancer.
Already debunked this in the comment you replied to. This talking point was disinformation spread by a malicious fucktard on Facebook and it was based off of a study from 2018, more than 2 years before the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines existed making it impossible to pretend like these mRNA vaccines could cause cancer using that study. Furthermore, they simply do not work that way at all. There is not delivery vector to mess with DNA which is how cancer is formed.
You haven't debunked anything. There are no long-term studies to disprove that there is a danger from the so-called "vaccine". You think you can mess with something so complex as the immune system by introducing a toxic protein which you force the body to produce at random sites, causing all kinds of havoc. The inflammatory response from the spike toxins has lead to thousands upon thousands of severe adverse reactions, from blood clots to nerve damage to miscarriages and other. Those are just the short-term outcomes. The long-term ones aren't really known yet. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome WILL mess up your immune system, which will increase cancer risk.
This guy nil keeps pushing things that seem like it could be right to the uneducated but totally wrong to a subject matter expert.
Case in point his breakdown of the Brandenburg test in another thread which was purposefully deceitful in telling Poalers that threatening imminent harm is free speech as long as the timeframe is over 365 days. That's getting you arrested.
WRONG
All I type here is 100% factual, and you seem to not know SCOTUS case law on definition of the word "IMMINENT" , and I provided helpful links, and facts and TIME FRAME.
over 365 is no longer "IMMINENT" in US case law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
Are you a new account paid jew leftist disenchanting SHILL?
You are obviously uneducated in law.
Your tactic of trying to correct me in matters I comment upon is comical to me and indicative of a classic ADL / SPLC / JIDF / ShareBlue attack method to run-off educated users from "free speech hate sites".
YOU ARE A PAID LEFTIST SHILL ACCOUNT and an alt of 'dadudemon1'!
https://files.catbox.moe/dv66rp.jpg
How's the weather in Tel Aviv, rabbi?
First learning about the Brandenburg test while using Wikipedia and being unable to check a user profile date for account creation as you along the "new shill" trope? Yep, you're a literal retard who is unqualified to give out information and the information you do give out is harmful.
Imminent has no time expiration. Specifying 366 days in advance still meets the threshold. You're going to get someone arrested.
FROF
Anyone reading this, look at how insane and full of copy/pasted distracting crap that the previous user is putting up to justify trying to get you arrested. Imminent doesn't mean happening soon, it means happening at a generally specific date and time. For example, "I'm going to kill you next year on Thanksgiving with a .50 caliber sniper rifle from the roof of your neighbor's house" doesn't pass the test even if it's over one year out.
Source: LexisNexis but most of you don't even know what that is.
Case in point his breakdown of the Brandenburg test in another thread which was purposefully deceitful in telling Poalers that threatening imminent harm is free speech as long as the timeframe is over 365 days. That's getting you arrested.
Unsure about the 365 days thing but there is a "immediacy" means test to criminally threats of violence.
Unprotected violence speech must have the following criteria:
Be intended to provoke imminent lawless action; and
Be likely to cause such action.
So like you said, he seems rather full of shit.
No that's simply wrong.
Cancer originates in the mitochondria, not the nucleus. DNA damage is downstream of the originating metabolic damage resulting in free radicals (Warburg Effect), and many cancers don't involve any DNA damage whatsoever. There is very clear clinical proof of this in that a cancer cell nucleus can be transplanted into non-cancerous cytoplasm and the cell will remain non-cancerous. The reverse is not true.
Many things that mess with metabolic processes can cause cancer, including most modern foods available today. It is not a stretch at all to think an MRNA vaccine can cause cancer since the spike proteins bind to ACE2 receptors that directly interface with the mitochondria and cause mitochondrial damage.
This is why you shouldn't simply defer any responsibility for critical thinking to "fact checkers".
Wrong.
Cancer is a genetic disease—that is, it is caused by changes to genes that control the way our cells function, especially how they grow and divide.
Genetic changes that cause cancer can happen because:
of errors that occur as cells divide. of damage to DNA caused by harmful substances in the environment, such as the chemicals in tobacco smoke and ultraviolet rays from the sun. (Our Cancer Causes and Prevention section has more information.) they were inherited from our parents. The body normally eliminates cells with damaged DNA before they turn cancerous. But the body’s ability to do so goes down as we age. This is part of the reason why there is a higher risk of cancer later in life.
Each person’s cancer has a unique combination of genetic changes. As the cancer continues to grow, additional changes will occur. Even within the same tumor, different cells may have different genetic changes.
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/what-is-cancer
But the anti-vax retards on this site will still think retards like you are right and eat up your retarded bullshit.
Notice how your pile of shit reply has no citations to back up your point and my comes right from the National Cancer Institute?
The only possible correctly reply to my comment is "you're right, fuck this guy for spreading disinformation." Any disagreement with me will be factually incorrect.
did you just link to a fact checking article seriously? pmsl
Did you just seriously miss the entire point and think this is about a fact checking article instead of the article pointing out the origin of this "cancer" talking point by linking the original 2018 research?
You do know you can skip the entire fact checking article, read the research the 'cancer' bullshit Facebook point was about, and see the date on that research article is clearly 2018.
Here's how it breaks down:
Retards: "SEEE! SEEE! THE RESEARCH SHOWS THESE COVID19 MRNA VACCINES CAUSE CANCER!!!!!"
Me: "You dumb retards. The research being cited is from 2018, a full 2 years and some change before the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were even used in human trials. It is literally impossible for this research to support your point because the fucking vaccines didn't even exist. You fucking retards."
Then retards like you respond, "ZOOOOMG!!! YOU USED A FACT CHECKING NEWS SITE TO PROVE IT WRONG!" As if you've never even heard of an ad hominem attack or even contemplated reading what you actually responded to. Like a proper retard.
Ap would never lie.
If you think this is about AP lying or not, you didn't understand my point and you didn't understand what AP was actually debunking.
Hint: AP linked to the study being used to blame the mRNA vaccines for the cancers and the study is from 2018, 2 years before these vaccines were even being used. With two brain cells, you can figure it out.
(post is archived)