WRONG
All I type here is 100% factual, and you seem to not know SCOTUS case law on definition of the word "IMMINENT" , and I provided helpful links, and facts and TIME FRAME.
over 365 is no longer "IMMINENT" in US case law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
Are you a new account paid jew leftist disenchanting SHILL?
You are obviously uneducated in law.
Your tactic of trying to correct me in matters I comment upon is comical to me and indicative of a classic ADL / SPLC / JIDF / ShareBlue attack method to run-off educated users from "free speech hate sites".
YOU ARE A PAID LEFTIST SHILL ACCOUNT and an alt of 'dadudemon1'!
https://files.catbox.moe/dv66rp.jpg
How's the weather in Tel Aviv, rabbi?
First learning about the Brandenburg test while using Wikipedia and being unable to check a user profile date for account creation as you along the "new shill" trope? Yep, you're a literal retard who is unqualified to give out information and the information you do give out is harmful.
Imminent has no time expiration. Specifying 366 days in advance still meets the threshold. You're going to get someone arrested.
FROF
Anyone reading this, look at how insane and full of copy/pasted distracting crap that the previous user is putting up to justify trying to get you arrested. Imminent doesn't mean happening soon, it means happening at a generally specific date and time. For example, "I'm going to kill you next year on Thanksgiving with a .50 caliber sniper rifle from the roof of your neighbor's house" doesn't pass the test even if it's over one year out.
Source: LexisNexis but most of you don't even know what that is.
(post is archived)