Finally done: >**Erwin Chrmerinsky**, dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, has an easier solution: **Don’t allow religious exemptions**. Guess the tribe of this faggot and he’s a **constitutional law expert** and the dean of Berkeley Law, no wonder the court system is in the Weimar Republic stage just like the rest of the US. From another article: >***along comes one of our nation's most respected law deans, Erwin Chemerinsky* of the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, proclaiming California's electoral process for recalling a governor to be "unconstitutional."** Everything a conservative does is unconstitutional. Here we go: >(((Chemerinsky)))argues that the Supreme Court has ruled the Constitution doesn’t require exceptions to laws that are generally applied and are not motivated by a desire to interfere with religion. The government doesn’t control the constitution, the people do, it’s OUR constitution. And “religion” doesn’t have to be organized you can violate someone’s religious rights just by forcing them to do things against their religious morals. I want this guy to order all muslims to eat only regular meat and not halal and watch the tests flow. >**Vaccination requirements are the epitome of such neutral laws, Chemerinsky said. *And even if they weren’t, the government can infringe on religious freedom in service of a compelling interest – such as stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease***. **We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed** Our rights are not granted from courts, lawyers or politicians. But from the creator. You can’t infringe on shit, even the curfews, capacity limits and gatherings of not over ten people were unconstitutional but nobody would challenge them. >**Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof**; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; *or the right of the people peaceably to assemble*, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Show me isadore where the above states this: >**And even if they weren’t, the government can infringe on religious freedom in service of a compelling interest – such as stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease**. No where, we haven’t granted you the power to restrict us, that was bestowed upon us at birth from the creator. And every year during the cold/flu season we don’t shut down church’s and the country until everyone gets a flu vaccine. Fucking jew. >A federal judge in Indiana’s northern district said that by offering religious exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines, Indiana University was to be applauded for having gone beyond what the Constitution requires. Of course a “follow the plan” Trump judge, Damon Ray Leichty and assumed office July 26, 2019 >Who also doesn’t know anything about the constitution and “applauds” them for going beyond what the constitution requires lol ok buddy, maybe take a remedial constitution class. The only reason the university put the new religious exemption in place was because it was unconstitutional to begin with not to allow it. I’m pretty sure someone in the WH/deep state told them to add the exemption so it didn’t go to the SC and blow up all their mandates and plans.