WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

448

In Louisiana, Attorney General Jeff Landry created a form for those who object to mask and vaccine mandates, allowing them to assert they do not consent to “forcing a face covering on my child, who is created in the image of God.”

“I believe that our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and that I am called to honor God in how I care for my body,” the form states.

Liberty Counsel, a Florida-based group that defends religious freedom cases, said it fields thousands of requests for assistance to avoid vaccinations – including many from federal employees.

In Louisiana, Attorney General Jeff Landry created a form for those who object to mask and vaccine mandates, allowing them to assert they do not consent to “forcing a face covering on my child, who is created in the image of God.” “I believe that our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and that I am called to honor God in how I care for my body,” the form states. Liberty Counsel, a Florida-based group that defends religious freedom cases, said it fields thousands of requests for assistance to avoid vaccinations – including **many from federal employees**.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I know one thing -- God has told my particular sect of Christian Gnosticism (which is made up of ... me) that he doesn't want people injecting me with vaccines. But is the government going to respect the religious rights of my sect?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

It's only a matter of how far you can push your larp, and most importantly how much you know your turf, because that's the means by which you'll be able to run your larp to infinity and beyond. You don't have to stick to established dogma or organized religions' standards to begin with, so you can take the bible and spin it the way you want, you don't have to belong to a particular branch of christianity it's just you and your bible. You have christian eschatology, revelation/mark of the beast, but that's more for the covid passport, so that's a bit far fetched for a vax, while the argument can be construed that the vaccine IS the mark of the beast, or a step toward it. Ultimately you don't even need to jump straight for revelation stuff; the "my body is the temple of holy spirit" is quite unquestionable/unobjectionable to begin with, it's square and simple, it can only be invalidated by your lifestyle eventually, like if you're a smoker or drinker, it's not going to be consistent with your supposed belief, it's going to be contradictory

[–] 0 pt

That’s not working here with this bitch. You need deeper and not revelations. Talk about how an ex girlfriend/wife aborted your baby against your wishes and you made a promise with god on your soul that you would refuse any treatment that has used fetal cells at any point even if it meant a cure for a cancer you have or you’d suffer in hell for eternity.

Employees offering as justification general beliefs about their body being a temple for the Holy Spirit won’t get one.

“That's just a statement, a term that you can pull out of Scripture,” Haddad said. “We can pull anything out of Scripture, but if you can’t apply it to your own life experience and what it means for you and articulate that in a way that is able to communicate a sense of full understanding on your part, that doesn't hold a lot of weight for me.”

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Just go full joseph smith https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith

[–] 1 pt

Seriously this article pissed me off, I had to stop lol.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, top medical adviser to President Joe Biden, said religious exemptions are “something we should look at.”

“If there is a legitimate religious exemption, fine. I am one of the people that respect the tenets of religion,” Fauci told USA TODAY's Editorial Board. “But if people make it up, and it's really a philosophical reason and they’re saying it's religious, that's not good.

What’s that mean? I thought veganism was even considered a religion. What needs to be looked at? a deeply held belief whether religious or philosophical is no different, if I don’t believe in abortion or using fetal cells or my/your body is a temple and get to decide what’s put in it why is that not a sincerely held belief?

When vaccinologist John Grabenstein looked at how the world’s major religions view vaccines for a 2013 paper, he found few theologically based objections…He also found plenty of examples of religions calling on people to stay healthy to prevent infection*.

I’ve never heard a pastor tell people to get a flu vaccine.

Every one of the major religions has a major emphasis on preserving life,

Like abortion or fetal cells?

whether that's Judaism, Christianity, Islam, etc.” he said. “Oftentimes, (there is) a claim of a religious prohibition, (but) when you get down into reading what the religions teach, it's not there.”

Because people don’t worship their religious leaders they have religious beliefs and their pope or whatever can say something completely asinine and they ignore them.

But courts have since struck down religious exemptions limited to organized or established religions as too narrow. They must also apply if a person’s beliefs are “sincerely held.”

Yeah, no kidding, their men not gods.

It is essentially impossible to look inside someone else and make a judgement about how honestly or deeply felt (a belief) is,

Oh I’m sure they’ll pull out the fmri’s to see if you’re telling the truth in the next few months.

Grabenstein said. “So it’s a conundrum for society.”

No, it’s a conundrum for you, how about the government and private businesses stay out of my head and I’ll leave you alone. Nobody has the right to know what I truly do or do not believe except me and the ones I wish to share it with.

That’s as far I’m going with this article. They’re trying to control read your minds and thoughts to try and distinguish philosophical between religious for the state.

Your conscience no longer matters people, the government decides what you’re allowed to object to put in your body unless it’s a fetus.

[–] 1 pt

I hate you Lmao. I can’t stop, this is petty dictator shit, she should be strung up over 1% of the staff requesting exemptions at a catholic hospital. But my Vatican.

“We have been very clear that the Vatican and church has basically said that getting a vaccine is morally acceptable,” said Sister Mary Haddad, the association’s president and CEO. “So there should be no religious exemption for a Catholic.

The Supreme Court ruled otherwise bitch, it’s you’re deeply held convictions and beliefs, not what corrupt little boy diddlers in funny hats say. You’re singling out one religion and could get sued.

Haddad estimated that less than 1% of staff has requested a religious exemption through what she called a “pretty stringent process.”

Wow only 1%, and she’s this big of dictator, gotta get them all.

Employees offering as justification general beliefs about their body being a temple for the Holy Spirit won’t get one.

Why? Who are you? Will she make muslims eat non-halal food, jews non-kosher, vegans meat products?

“That's just a statement, a term that you can pull out of Scripture,” Haddad said. “We can pull anything out of Scripture, but if you can’t apply it to your own life experience and what it means for you and articulate that in a way that is able to communicate a sense of full understanding on your part, that doesn't hold a lot of weight for me.

Again who the fuck are you? It doesn’t matter what you think or if someone isn’t articulate in explaining their beliefs.

Wasn’t it just a few years ago women couldn’t “handle” pressure of questions about job performances/raises and they just go along with whatever the person in charge says, maybe or maybe not get a raise then cry afterwards and that’s just a job.

Now you have to articulate perfectly your deeply held beliefs to a complete stranger and do it in a way that satisfies her?

Is she taking rumors of affairs or drinking into account in this also, oh this bitch goes out and parties and sleeps around, what kinda person desecrates their temple like this? DENIED.

[–] 1 pt

Some abortion opponents object to the use of a cell line from an abortion 36 years ago to create Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine. Fetal cells were used in the early testing, though not in the production, of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

What would that 36yo old say today if he’d been born, would he be pro or anti vax?

Still, the anti-abortion Catholic Church has said the vaccines are “morally acceptable.”

So is pedophilia for them it doesn’t make it morally acceptable for the rest of us.

[–] 1 pt

Finally done:

Erwin Chrmerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, has an easier solution: Don’t allow religious exemptions.

Guess the tribe of this faggot and he’s a constitutional law expert and the dean of Berkeley Law, no wonder the court system is in the Weimar Republic stage just like the rest of the US.

From another article:

*along comes one of our nation's most respected law deans, Erwin Chemerinsky* of the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, proclaiming California's electoral process for recalling a governor to be "unconstitutional."

Everything a conservative does is unconstitutional.

Here we go:

(((Chemerinsky)))argues that the Supreme Court has ruled the Constitution doesn’t require exceptions to laws that are generally applied and are not motivated by a desire to interfere with religion.

The government doesn’t control the constitution, the people do, it’s OUR constitution. And “religion” doesn’t have to be organized you can violate someone’s religious rights just by forcing them to do things against their religious morals. I want this guy to order all muslims to eat only regular meat and not halal and watch the tests flow.

Vaccination requirements are the epitome of such neutral laws, Chemerinsky said. *And even if they weren’t, the government can infringe on religious freedom in service of a compelling interest – such as stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease*.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

Our rights are not granted from courts, lawyers or politicians. But from the creator. You can’t infringe on shit, even the curfews, capacity limits and gatherings of not over ten people were unconstitutional but nobody would challenge them.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Show me isadore where the above states this:

And even if they weren’t, the government can infringe on religious freedom in service of a compelling interest – such as stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease.

No where, we haven’t granted you the power to restrict us, that was bestowed upon us at birth from the creator. And every year during the cold/flu season we don’t shut down church’s and the country until everyone gets a flu vaccine. Fucking jew.

A federal judge in Indiana’s northern district said that by offering religious exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines, Indiana University was to be applauded for having gone beyond what the Constitution requires.

Of course a “follow the plan” Trump judge, Damon Ray Leichty and assumed office July 26, 2019

Who also doesn’t know anything about the constitution and “applauds” them for going beyond what the constitution requires lol ok buddy, maybe take a remedial constitution class.

The only reason the university put the new religious exemption in place was because it was unconstitutional to begin with not to allow it. I’m pretty sure someone in the WH/deep state told them to add the exemption so it didn’t go to the SC and blow up all their mandates and plans.

And even if they weren’t, the government can infringe on religious freedom in service of a compelling interest – such as stopping the spread of a deadly communicable disease.

No where, we haven’t granted you the power to restrict us, that was bestowed upon us at birth from the creator. And every year during the cold/flu season we don’t shut down church’s and the country until everyone gets a flu vaccine. Fucking jew.

He omitted the most important part. A remedy that violates your right has to be narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling interest. Forcing everyone to wear masks or get vaccines being "narrowly tailored" strains credulity. It's ridiculous on its face.

[–] 1 pt

If you look him up he misses a lot about the constitution, he’s all over the place, unconstitutional if a conservative does something, a liberal does the same it’s constitutional. Just the usual jewish lefty hypocrite.

This guy is really just a loud mouth with no power. I find the nun more troubling with her power trip in the first link I sent.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

I was scared to click that link lol. I thought it was more of the little dictators talking about religious freedom and the constitution.

I’m done with these idiots for the night.

[–] 1 pt

Fuck I read the next section.

The courts were right to keep government out of the practice of judging people’s souls, said Reiss, a professor at University of California Hastings College of Law.

“The problem is,” she added, “that makes policing (religious exemptions) very hard.”

The difficulty is compounded by the fact that religious freedom is a core value in the United States.

Reiss said there’s no hard data to show how many people are falsely claiming religious beliefs to avoid vaccinations.

“But I can say we have very strong indication most of them are,” she said.

Really I thought roughly 50% of the population was pro life and only would allow abortions in cases of rape or incest at most. So how is it “most of them are falsely claiming religious exemptions”.

[–] 1 pt

The liberty council gets it:

'Temple of God'

But that’s the kind of personal religious objection being voiced by most of the people who have been reaching out to Liberty Counsel for help.

“Some people say that their body is the temple of God, and that they don't want to put anything in it that would harm their body,” said Staver, the group’s chairman.

It doesn’t legally matter, he said, whether a person’s view on vaccines aligns with what their church says.

“What's relevant is what the individual's religious belief is,” he said. “As long as it's a sincerely held religious belief, it is personal and not denominational or organizational.”

That bitch should be sued and the hospital system. She claims the Vatican when she knows damn well it’s about a “sincerely held religious belief” and it doesn’t matter what you’re church or leaders say, it’s between you and god, not some office bureaucrat.