That's what happens when you call the gene therapy jab a 'vaccine'. Doesn't make it a vaccine, doesn't protect anyone from anything.
Not that flu vaccines were ever effective anyway.
Influenza vaccines are perfectly effective ... assuming they guessed correctly at which strains would be the hot spots that year.
It was just a guess, and like most guesses, it's probably somewhere south of 50/50.
But the flu vaccine uses actual parts of the flu viruses, they guess months ahead and the side effects are well known.
In decades they’ve never got a working mRna vaccine. This was their big clinical trial they’d been waiting for. Why did ModeRNA, change their name to moderna? What products did they have to be valued in the billions before the pandemic.
Yes, that's why they're effective - assuming the correct strains are cultivated. Since they usually aren't, the overall effectiveness is usually not much.
I just wonder how many are going to have to die before someone finally admits there's a problem.
So majority ineffective.
I'd also like to see proof that they were ever effective. Not a pharma manufacturer produced study intended to get FDA approval. I want to see an example of when the vaccine was formulated correctly reducing the number of flu cases/deaths versus the average year.
That data doesn't exist because what's given isn't effective enough to do anything because of the aforementioned guessing.
So yeah, for all intents and purposes, they aren't effective or useful.
(post is archived)