We all agree that rioting and violence should be punished. We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech.
We all agree? Hardly.
>
We all agree that rioting and violence should be punished. We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech.
We all agree? Hardly.
If it was both directions and both sides, someone could make that argument, but it isn't.
If it was both directions and both sides, someone could make that argument, but it isn't.
We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech. Many of those punished in recent days have been convicted for exactly those things.
Other arguments one might make:
- If you're gonna do the time.....
- In for a penny in for a pound.
>We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech. **Many of those punished in recent days have been convicted for exactly those things.**
Other arguments one might make:
- If you're gonna do the time.....
- In for a penny in for a pound.
(post is archived)