WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

This wasn’t about cutting sugar consumption. It was about inverse subsidizing bioengineered chemicals in food by taxing the shit out of those producing foods with cane sugar.

A similar feat was performed for a different purpose in the US in the 1980s when they landed an oppressive tariff on imported cane sugar to promote the use of mercury-laden high fructose corn syrup.