WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

How about. FUCK YOU UK. SUCK A *******. Yes, we ARE ACTIVLY HOSTILE AGAINST YOU AND YOUR OVERREACH.

Archive: https://archive.today/yrAhP

From the post:

>Developers of apps that use end-to-end encryption to protect private communications could be considered hostile actors in the UK. That is the stark warning from Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation and Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, in a new report on national security laws. In his independent review of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act and the newly implemented National Security Act, Hall KC highlights the incredibly broad scope of powers granted to authorities.

How about. FUCK YOU UK. SUCK A *******. **Yes, we ARE ACTIVLY HOSTILE AGAINST YOU AND YOUR OVERREACH.** Archive: https://archive.today/yrAhP From the post: >>Developers of apps that use end-to-end encryption to protect private communications could be considered hostile actors in the UK. That is the stark warning from Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation and Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, in a new report on national security laws. In his independent review of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act and the newly implemented National Security Act, Hall KC highlights the incredibly broad scope of powers granted to authorities.
[–] 1 pt

Let's say we just can the whole idea of encryption. It's not necessary as it makes police have to actually work. We don’t want that do we?

[–] 1 pt

This a thought path for these fucks. Not knowing how banning data is encrypted and health data….