"[T]he Supreme Court should never have interpreted §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to effectively give racial groups an entitlement to roughly proportional. Wednesday’s decision, Thomas wrote, “should largely put an end to this ‘disastrous misadventure’ in voting-rights jurisprudence.”
>"[T]he Supreme Court should never have interpreted §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to effectively give racial groups an entitlement to roughly proportional. Wednesday’s decision, Thomas wrote, “should largely put an end to this ‘disastrous misadventure’ in voting-rights jurisprudence.”