Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

735

Yes, the Supreme Court has held that bans on an entire class of firearms like handguns are unconstitutional. The gun control lobby, though, wants to test just how far that applies. Can bans on subsets of handguns, like all striker-fired pistols, survive judicial scrutiny? These are arms in common use for lawful purposes, after all, including by law enforcement.

And if these pistols are as inherently dangerous as the bills' sponsors claim, then there's no reason why the Baltimore PD and the Maryland State Police should be able to continue to purchase them. Guns can be stolen, and police officers can be the victims of theft just like the rest of us.

> Yes, the Supreme Court has held that bans on an entire class of firearms like handguns are unconstitutional. The gun control lobby, though, wants to test just how far that applies. Can bans on subsets of handguns, like all striker-fired pistols, survive judicial scrutiny? These are arms in common use for lawful purposes, after all, including by law enforcement. > And if these pistols are as inherently dangerous as the bills' sponsors claim, then there's no reason why the Baltimore PD and the Maryland State Police should be able to continue to purchase them. Guns can be stolen, and police officers can be the victims of theft just like the rest of us.
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (1).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

It's all so fucking tiring with these gun grabbers. They just never quit pushing. They need to have consequences for their attempts to subvert the constitution. Bills should be vetted by some kind of constitutional authority and if the bill is found to be against the bill of rights, all who wrote should jailed immediately.

A guy can dream right?