WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

945

When someone gets slapped with a domestic violence restraining order, they temporarily lose their Second Amendment rights. The argument is that they're a probable danger to at least one person, and since a judge signs off on the order, that's sufficient due process.

Now, I don't agree with that, simply because too many judges will sign such orders as a matter of form. They're often concerned that if they don't sign it, and the woman gets murdered by her allegedly abusive ex, it'll be on him.

It seems that a judge in Idaho agrees with me that it's unconstitutional to strip someone of their rights based mostly on allegations.

Unfortunately for that judge and me, a federal judge disagreed with us.

> When someone gets slapped with a domestic violence restraining order, they temporarily lose their Second Amendment rights. The argument is that they're a probable danger to at least one person, and since a judge signs off on the order, that's sufficient due process. > Now, I don't agree with that, simply because too many judges will sign such orders as a matter of form. They're often concerned that if they don't sign it, and the woman gets murdered by her allegedly abusive ex, it'll be on him. > It seems that a judge in Idaho agrees with me that it's unconstitutional to strip someone of their rights based mostly on allegations. > Unfortunately for that judge and me, a federal judge disagreed with us.
[–] 1 pt

These are probably the same judges that release criminal niggers into society to rack up dozens of felonies.

[–] 1 pt

It's nice to notice that they completely ignore the fact that all anti gun legislation is illegal and unconstitutional.