The US Constitution is supposed to be a bulwark against such incursions into our way of life. Sadly, it relies on men to implement, and men are quite often corrupt. Having a King like Britain's Charles is no better than having no king at all.
The US Constitution is ***supposed*** to be a bulwark against such incursions into our way of life. Sadly, it relies on men to implement, and men are quite often corrupt. Having a King like Britain's Charles is no better than having no king at all.
(post is archived)