Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

440

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts

This reads like a high schooler trying to write a TV show. Seems fishy.

[–] • 2 pts

There's a lot of other stuff out there talking about that exact thing, about how it's too rhythmic and well written. It's suspicious at best, fake and gayer than a furfag in a fox suit with "yiff me" on the back wandering around a furry convention at worst.

Don't poke your nose into the really dark corners of the Internet, kids. It changes you, tells you things you don't want to know.

[–] • 1 pt

Half of the conversation doesn't make any sense. Plus, how the fuck did he get all the way back to this house with the cops locking everything down? They would be watching the roads, right?

[–] • 2 pts

ROOMMATE: “How long have you been planning this?” ROBINSON: “A bit over a week, I believe."

Fucking bullshit. He "believes" he's been planning this? I swear, if this soap opera lie was written by AI, I'm-a lose it.

[–] • 1 pt

The text conversation was fed into AI and then asked what I thought. AI determined that was not a natural conversation. It was most likely a pretty fabricated story to protect the other

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not buying it. Seems fake to me.

[–] • 0 pt

The language in this is unnatural for a 20-something zoomer. It’s full of terms that law enforcement personnel use. “vehicle”, “drop point”, ”my love”, ”attempt to retrieve it”, “squad car”, ”my old man”, “delete this exchange”. It thoroughly covers every detail required to incriminate and implicate the suspect and it does it in the language of law enforcement.

You would get something like this exchange if you gave an FBI agent the following instructions: Write a fictional conversation between the suspect and his roommate where the suspect admits to the murder (and his motive) and describes his relevant actions on the day of the murder.

[–] • 0 pt

"Remember how he was engraving bullets?"

Who is he?