WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

553

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that a California law requiring background checks for individuals purchasing ammunition is unconstitutional, upholding a previous judge’s ruling striking down the law.

The background check for ammo purchases law had been struck down twice by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez before a lawsuit was brought by a coalition of gun owners and gun rights groups who sued the state, saying that the law infringed on the Second Amendment rights of Californians.

[Source](https://amgreatness.com/2025/07/31/california-law-requiring-background-checks-for-ammo-declared-unconstitutional/) > The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that a California law requiring background checks for individuals purchasing ammunition is unconstitutional, upholding a previous judge’s ruling striking down the law. > The background check for ammo purchases law had been struck down twice by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez before a lawsuit was brought by a coalition of gun owners and gun rights groups who sued the state, saying that the law infringed on the Second Amendment rights of Californians.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I want the fuckers that pull shit like this that force us to go to the courts to go to JAIL.

They knew it was unconstitutional when they passed it. They knew it would be challenged, they knew they would lose. All this did is piss everyone off and cost a bunch of money. Blatantly creating unconstitutional laws should come with JAIL TIME.

[–] 1 pt

The process is the punishment. They do this shit on purpose to make it as hard on us as possible.