WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

She added, "We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."

Justice Jackson has no business being on that court

[–] 1 pt

I think she should take a vacation, maybe to the Cibolo Creek Ranch resort, and think about why she is at odds with the constitution.