WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

414

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is supposed to protect the gun industry from stupid, ridiculous lawsuits. They can still be sued when they screw up, such as making a faulty chamber on a gun that explodes, but not because someone did something with a gun that was beyond the power of the company in question to prevent.

But what if, after the fact, you can argue that they actually could?

That seems to be what's going on with a lawsuit against the sporting goods company Scheels, which a judge is allowing to proceed.

> The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is supposed to protect the gun industry from stupid, ridiculous lawsuits. They can still be sued when they screw up, such as making a faulty chamber on a gun that explodes, but not because someone did something with a gun that was beyond the power of the company in question to prevent. > But what if, after the fact, you can argue that they actually could? > That seems to be what's going on with a lawsuit against the sporting goods company Scheels, which a judge is allowing to proceed.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This shit has to end.

Can I sue the (activist) Judge for not putting every nigger in jail forever? They cause far more violence than anyone else.