Could A Bombshell Discovery Render All of Biden's Presidential Actions 'Null and Void'?

685

•

Cover Up Could A Bombshell Discovery Render All of Biden's Presidential Actions 'Null and Void'? (www.zerohedge.com)

The Biden presidency might have been the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the American people. A shocking investigation by the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project has revealed that virtually every document bearing Joe Biden's signature during his presidency was signed by an autopen — except for one.

What makes this revelation particularly damning is that the only document confirmed to have Biden's actual signature was his letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. Let that sink in for a moment.

Remember when House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) revealed his discussion with Biden when Biden couldn't recall signing the executive order halting LNG exports? Now we know why — he probably didn't. The real question is: Who did? Who was running the country while Biden was not all there?

The use of the presidential autopen dates back to the 1950s, and there's been much debate about its legality. In 2013, Barack Obama became the first president to sign a bill into law using an autopen. He was vacationing in Hawaii at the time. His office relied on a 30-page memo from President George W. Bush's legal team asserting that the president's presence was not required as long as said president had authorized the signature.

What's not clear, in the case of Biden, is who was running the autopen and whether Biden was aware it was happening. . . Thanks to the Heritage Foundation's investigation, we now have proof that Biden's signature was automated throughout his presidency — which raises serious questions about whether he was aware of what was being signed in his name at all. The Oversight Project rightfully points out that since Biden revoked Trump's executive privilege, we can easily determine who controlled the autopen and what safeguards, if any, were in place.

The implications are staggering. We essentially had a presidency by proxy, with unelected staffers wielding presidential power while the man himself was barely cognizant enough to read a teleprompter. This isn't just a scandal; it's potentially the biggest constitutional crisis in American history.

The American people deserve to know who was really calling the shots during the Biden administration. If these allegations prove true, every single action taken under Biden's name needs to be scrutinized and potentially nullified. The truth must come out, and those responsible must be held accountable.

Do you think the mainstream media will cover this explosive autopen scandal? Don't count on it, but PJ Media won't back down from exposing the truth about who was really running the Biden White House.

>The Biden presidency might have been the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the American people. A shocking investigation by the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project has revealed that virtually every document bearing Joe Biden's signature during his presidency was signed by an autopen — except for one. >What makes this revelation particularly damning is that the only document confirmed to have Biden's actual signature was his letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. Let that sink in for a moment. >Remember when House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) revealed his discussion with Biden when Biden couldn't recall signing the executive order halting LNG exports? Now we know why — he probably didn't. The real question is: Who did? Who was running the country while Biden was not all there? >The use of the presidential autopen dates back to the 1950s, and there's been much debate about its legality. In 2013, Barack Obama became the first president to sign a bill into law using an autopen. He was vacationing in Hawaii at the time. His office relied on a 30-page memo from President George W. Bush's legal team asserting that the president's presence was not required as long as said president had authorized the signature. >What's not clear, in the case of Biden, is who was running the autopen and whether Biden was aware it was happening. . . Thanks to the Heritage Foundation's investigation, we now have proof that Biden's signature was automated throughout his presidency — which raises serious questions about whether he was aware of what was being signed in his name at all. The Oversight Project rightfully points out that since Biden revoked Trump's executive privilege, we can easily determine who controlled the autopen and what safeguards, if any, were in place. >The implications are staggering. We essentially had a presidency by proxy, with unelected staffers wielding presidential power while the man himself was barely cognizant enough to read a teleprompter. This isn't just a scandal; it's potentially the biggest constitutional crisis in American history. >The American people deserve to know who was really calling the shots during the Biden administration. If these allegations prove true, every single action taken under Biden's name needs to be scrutinized and potentially nullified. The truth must come out, and those responsible must be held accountable. >Do you think the mainstream media will cover this explosive autopen scandal? Don't count on it, but PJ Media won't back down from exposing the truth about who was really running the Biden White House. [Archive](https://archive.today/qq7Fn)

[–] • 0 pt

This is interesting, but nothing will come of it.

We all know that they were drafting bills and putting his signature on them without even showing them to him first. He was at least aware that they were signing bills on his behalf. He may not have known the full extent of this, but he would never admit that bills were signed without his knowledge; nor will anyone else involved.

[–] • 1 pt

he would never admit that bills were signed without his knowledge

Even the treasonous, high crimes and misdemeanor ones? Remember, he forgot to premptively pardon himself.

(post is archived)