Only at the corporate or institutional levels. His intent was to support the constitution by outlawing institutional discrimination against a (((specific religion))), while not impacting 1A rights for US citizens to say what they want.
!
Hey Morbo, I need a sanity translation here. How does outlawing antisemitism - you know, violating the 1st amendment which allows us to say jews suck and need to fuck off into the ocean as a race and religion both and point out their power and question the holohoax - uphold the constitution?
Hey Morbo, I need a sanity translation here. How does outlawing antisemitism - you know, violating the 1st amendment which allows us to say jews suck and need to fuck off into the ocean as a race and religion both and point out their power and question the holohoax - uphold the constitution?
It doesn't. It actually violates the 1A because it makes a carve out for a specific (((group))) to be shielded from speech they don't like. This EO is 100% unconstitutional and Lurker is deep throating (((zion don))) once again.
"It's actually a good thing that Trump is cracking down on Antisemitism because Constitution."
(post is archived)