>The indulgent spending has caused broader concerns about the Democrats campaign give badly they lost the election despite a $1 billion war chest.
I had to read this line like 6 fucking times to figure out what they fuck they are saying. Why do I have to interpret fucking articles these days? The art of writing is a distant memory.
>>The indulgent spending has caused broader concerns about the Democrats campaign give badly they lost the election despite a $1 billion war chest.
I had to read this line like 6 fucking times to figure out what they fuck they are saying. Why do I have to interpret fucking articles these days? The art of writing is a distant memory.
Because they have DEI writers who don't know that it should say "given how badly" instead of "give badly".
Because they have DEI writers who don't know that it should say "given how badly" instead of "give badly".
This is the state of british literature today.
This is the state of british literature today.
This is the state of all media today. It is a rare occasion that I am able to read an entire article without finding multiple spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors.
This is the state of all media today. It is a rare occasion that I am able to read an entire article without finding multiple spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors.
(post is archived)