Meanwhile the appellate court lawyers who brought the "fraud" case against Trump used their closing arguments to plead for no sanctions against them instead of arguing their case. They had to do this becuase they were the first to bring a criminal trial to the courts that had zero actual victims, and the crime was nullified as the "victim" stated Trump was getting the loans no matter what the evaluation of the property was and paid back on time without incident.
Meanwhile the appellate court lawyers who brought the "fraud" case against Trump used their closing arguments to plead for no sanctions against them instead of arguing their case. They had to do this becuase they were the first to bring a criminal trial to the courts that had zero actual victims, and the crime was nullified as the "victim" stated Trump was getting the loans no matter what the evaluation of the property was and paid back on time without incident.
(post is archived)