Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

Some attendees at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee are sporting makeshift ear bandages in support of almost-assassinated former President Donald Trump — with one calling it “the newest fashion trend.”

…“This is the newest fashion trend!” delegate Joe Neglia, 63, of Arizona, told CBS News of the folded white envelope he taped across his own ear. “I’m getting this going — everybody in the world is going to be wearing one of these pretty soon. It’s the latest thing,” he said. “I’m setting new fashion ground here.”

Neglia said he “folded it up on the bus on the way here” in “sympathy with Donald Trump. “It’s just in sympathy with Donald Trump,” Neglia added in an interview with The Guardian. “I saw that man get shot, I thought that man has almost given his life for his country, he deserves some respect for that,” he told the Guardian.

additional source: NY Post

>Some attendees at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee are sporting makeshift ear bandages in support of almost-assassinated former President Donald Trump — with one calling it “the newest fashion trend.” >…“This is the newest fashion trend!” delegate Joe Neglia, 63, of Arizona, told CBS News of the folded white envelope he taped across his own ear. “I’m getting this going — everybody in the world is going to be wearing one of these pretty soon. It’s the latest thing,” he said. “I’m setting new fashion ground here.” >Neglia said he “folded it up on the bus on the way here” in “sympathy with Donald Trump. “It’s just in sympathy with Donald Trump,” Neglia added in an interview with The Guardian. “I saw that man get shot, I thought that man has almost given his life for his country, he deserves some respect for that,” he told the Guardian. >additional source: NY Post

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] • 0 pt

No, it's respecting their national sovereignty. Who are we to invade uninvited? That is not the non-interventionist American way, that is the (((UniParty))) way that creates White brother wars (Ukraine/EU/Russia as a most recent example)

If we are invited, different story. As long as it is truly the righteous thing to do, but we have to be invited to help them to help themselves. And again, I would not want American boots on foreign soil. We want to end the brother wars, not start up new ones.

[–] • 1 pt

No, it's respecting their national sovereignty. Who are we to invade uninvited? That is not the non-interventionist American way, that is the (((UniParty))) way that creates White brother wars (Ukraine/EU/Russia as a most recent example)

If we are invited, different story. As long as it is truly the righteous thing to do, but we have to be invited to help them to help themselves. And again, I would not want American boots on foreign soil. We want to end the brother wars, not start up new ones.

The jews thank you for your help in allowing them to prosper. Whites can't help other Whites if imaginary political boundaries are drawn on some map. They'll have to help themselves because we don't want to offend anyone. We need consent to help. We must respect their boundaries. We cannot "rape" their borders with our unwanted advancement. They have a right to protect the persecuted jews. Yup...jew language setting up the rules that protect them from being removed. Your programming is stronger than I imagined.

[–] • 0 pt

Whites can't help other Whites if imaginary political boundaries are drawn on some map

imaginary political boundaries

Seriously Morbo? C'mon. You are laying the foundation for the brother wars you wish to avoid with this line of thought.

There are an estimated 15.7M jews in the world. You are telling me that you think we have to invade western countries, our boots on the ground fighting other whites defending their sovereignty, to eradicate a handful of jews from their country. No, they should be fully capable of handling the wetwork themselves without us violating their sovereignty. If they need intelligence, weapons, logistics ... and ask our help I'm sure we can assist them to meet their objectives.

[–] • 1 pt

You are telling me that you think we have to invade western countries, our boots on the ground fighting other whites defending their sovereignty, to eradicate a handful of jews from their country. No, they should be fully capable of handling the wetwork themselves without us violating their sovereignty.

You were the one who suggested it has to be by invasion that the jews are removed from every place they are. That makes me question whether you think Whites in other nations are incapable of seeing the problem and dealing with it without the "leadership" of the USA.