“I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example, that the public has accurate information in the context of a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”

Shows how dangerous this line of thinking is. We know that their "accurate information" was complete bullshit. While often correct opposing views were being labeled as disinformation.

*Supreme Court *Justice Jackson.

One of the people who gets to decide if a law or verdict is constitutional.

That's who has a problem with the First Amendment.

What a cunt.

The ENTIRE Bill of Rights IS, Nothing But 'restrictions on the Gov.'

Judicial activist on the Supreme Court.

But of course it's the fat, black, female.

Has she learned biology yet? That's something everyone knows even as an elementary school student.

anoeses: consciousness that is pure passive receptiveness without understanding or intellectual organization of the materials presented
anoetic: Not subject to conscious attention; having an indefinite, relatively passive, conscious being; characteristic of the “fringe” or “margin” of consciousness. Dunning-Kruger effect: a type of cognitive bias in which people believe they are smarter and more capable than they are. a lack of Metacognition: refers to the ability to step back and look at one's behavior and abilities from outside of oneself. BECOMING A MASTER CHANGE AGENT https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/105776_book_item_105776.pdf