Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

amicus brief in (Smith) US v Trump https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf

"What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title “Special Counsel.” That is what happened on November 18, 2022. That appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including citizen Smith’s current attempt to obtain a ruling from this Court".

amicus brief in (Smith) US v Trump https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf "What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title “Special Counsel.” That is what happened on November 18, 2022. That appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including citizen Smith’s current attempt to obtain a ruling from this Court".

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 2 pts

Yes, this is the amicus brief though, and if it ever gets to the Supreme Court for decision, this is all the work done for the judges on why citizen Smith's witch hunt is illegal. The amicus brief also mentions that citizen Mueller's crap witch hunt was illegal too.

[–] • 2 pts

Damn, thought it was a ruling.