Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

883

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 25 as unconstitutional a Minnesota law allowing government to pocket the profits of property seized from indebted residents: a common practice in Illinois, where a study of the 11 largest counties found $400 million in government property theft.

>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 25 as unconstitutional a Minnesota law allowing government to pocket the profits of property seized from indebted residents: a common practice in Illinois, where a study of the 11 largest counties found $400 million in government property theft.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Applying a tax to a static asset seems unconstitutional too. The idea that you can pay your home off and still have a monthly payment that can cause your home to be seized if you don't pay is absolute bullshit.

[–] • 1 pt

We fought a revolution for 1/1000th the transgression. Think about that.