WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 25 as unconstitutional a Minnesota law allowing government to pocket the profits of property seized from indebted residents: a common practice in Illinois, where a study of the 11 largest counties found $400 million in government property theft.

>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 25 as unconstitutional a Minnesota law allowing government to pocket the profits of property seized from indebted residents: a common practice in Illinois, where a study of the 11 largest counties found $400 million in government property theft.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

really US government is an organized crime racket

how did they even voted this to be "legal" ?

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Applying a tax to a static asset seems unconstitutional too. The idea that you can pay your home off and still have a monthly payment that can cause your home to be seized if you don't pay is absolute bullshit.

[–] 1 pt

We fought a revolution for 1/1000th the transgression. Think about that.