Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

884

Sunday, defenestrated House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who bills himself as the “outgoing chairman,” appeared in ABC’s “This Week” with Jonathan Karl. During that appearance, he said that Congress should receive a damage assessment of the stolen documents and he was going to “reserve judgment” on the matter until all the evidence was in. This is a stark departure from how he treated President Trump’s case, where he virtually accused him of high treason before the FBI agents had finished fondling Melania’s underwear (to be clear, she was not wearing them at the time).

Given Schiff’s history of lying and doggedly defending Biden, to see him reduced to taking a wait-and-see position was curious. As I pointed out in my post earlier tonight (Chuck Todd Joins the Media Crowd Losing Their Crap Over Joe Biden’s Pilfered Secret Documents), even the most partisan Democrats are holding back from defending Biden. My colleague Nick Arama covers the sleazy Jamie Raskin squirming like a worm on a fishhook when questioned about the Biden document theft (CNN and ABC Nail Schiff and Raskin on the Biden Classified Documents Scandal).

> Sunday, defenestrated House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, who bills himself as the “outgoing chairman,” appeared in ABC’s “This Week” with Jonathan Karl. During that appearance, he said that Congress should receive a damage assessment of the stolen documents and he was going to “reserve judgment” on the matter until all the evidence was in. This is a stark departure from how he treated President Trump’s case, where he virtually accused him of high treason before the FBI agents had finished fondling Melania’s underwear (to be clear, she was not wearing them at the time). > Given Schiff’s history of lying and doggedly defending Biden, to see him reduced to taking a wait-and-see position was curious. As I pointed out in my post earlier tonight (Chuck Todd Joins the Media Crowd Losing Their Crap Over Joe Biden’s Pilfered Secret Documents), even the most partisan Democrats are holding back from defending Biden. My colleague Nick Arama covers the sleazy Jamie Raskin squirming like a worm on a fishhook when questioned about the Biden document theft (CNN and ABC Nail Schiff and Raskin on the Biden Classified Documents Scandal).

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Seems to me that this is a move. To whom it is a move for.. we all know the “news” wouldn’t show us shit unless it’s part of their plan. So democrats want joe out. This has to be true. I’d say then Kamala would be president-she ineligible, but that didn’t stop Obama. She has been quiet and distancing herself from the big guy.. so what’s the move?

[–] • 1 pt

How many of those documents were actually there, and how many were planted to get rid of now-useless joe?

[–] • 1 pt

How many of those documents were actually there, and how many were planted to get rid of now-useless joe?

I don't think we'll ever know.
Maybe in 75 years the truth will come out, but I doubt it.

[–] • 0 pt

If Joe gets kicked out before his term is over, we can probably assume they were planted - or at the very least, were known about and looked for until they were found.

[–] • 1 pt

If Joe gets kicked out before his term is over, we can probably assume they were planted - or at the very least, were known about and looked for until they were found.

Before he was sworn in, I was saying Joe would be out by that first Halloween to make room for the Dindu Hindu. I guess it's taken this long because they realized (too late) what an idiot she is and that they'd have a hard time controlling her. At this point I think they have a plan for how to get Harris out too, so they can install someone like Big Mike, Susan Rice, or Pete Buttplug.