Chapman wrote
“It provides no justification for counties to exclude ballots based on a minor omission, and we expect that counties will continue to comply with their obligation to count all legal votes.”
count all legal votes.
About that. The SCOTUS ruling specifically overturned it because missing information, by law makes it not legal. Chapman is a jewish name?
>Chapman wrote
>>“It provides no justification for counties to exclude ballots based on a minor omission, and we expect that counties will continue to comply with their obligation to count all legal votes.”
>count all legal votes.
About that. The SCOTUS ruling specifically overturned it because missing information, by law makes it not legal.
Chapman is a jewish name?
Minor Omissions: no date no ID no address no proof of residency no proof of citizenship no voter roll match no signature match no ballot serial or sequential numbering no certificate of origin or chain of custody affidavit delivery by out of state common carrier or POV no paper record no audits no accountability
Minor Omissions:
no date
no ID
no address
no proof of residency
no proof of citizenship
no voter roll match
no signature match
no ballot serial or sequential numbering
no certificate of origin or chain of custody affidavit
delivery by out of state common carrier or POV
no paper record
no audits
no accountability
(post is archived)