Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the

Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.

First and foremost, this ***is not*** a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the [California Constitution.](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=I) Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the California Constitution.

Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?

[–] • 0 pt

Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?

Citizens can sue a state for violating rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If the state breaks federal law, citizens have that recourse. This instance (in the OP) is specifically a violation of the state constitution first.