WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the

Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.

First and foremost, this ***is not*** a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the [California Constitution.](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=I) Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

"Doctors all agree muh jab is safe and effective ™."

"Why though?"

"Because they fucking have to!"