I think most blue states are doing the same but silently by revoking licenses.
I think most blue states are doing the same but silently by revoking licenses.
First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the
Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.
First and foremost, this ***is not*** a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature.
CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the [California Constitution.](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=I)
Secondly, this will undoubtedly go to the courts. Even California doctors aren't that sheepish.
well they know they can't go head on in courts with 1st Amendment so they just run right over it much like they did with many of our rights during cvd.
and misinformation? you mean like literally every sentence from the CDC, fraudci, Biden admin, etc? like that kind of misinformation?
well they know they can't go head on in courts with 1st Amendment so they just run right over it much like they did with many of our rights during cvd.
and misinformation? you mean like literally every sentence from the CDC, fraudci, Biden admin, etc? like that kind of misinformation?
can we pass a law that give the death penalty to politicians if they knowing withhold deadly data about medicine for their own political purposes
can we pass a law that give the death penalty to politicians if they knowing withhold deadly data about medicine for their own political purposes
"Doctors all agree muh jab is safe and effective ™."
"Why though?"
"Because they fucking have to!"
"Doctors all agree muh jab is safe and effective ™."
"Why though?"
"Because they fucking have to!"
I've never seen a state try to fuck itself so hard and so often. Before they're done they'll have no water, no electricity, no food, no cars, no actual US citizens, no income, and no doctors worth a damn. Luckily, they will still have plenty of representation in Congress to try to impose their forced collapse of civilization onto the rest of us.
I've never seen a state try to fuck itself so hard and so often. Before they're done they'll have no water, no electricity, no food, no cars, no actual US citizens, no income, and no doctors worth a damn. Luckily, they will still have plenty of representation in Congress to try to impose their forced collapse of civilization onto the rest of us.
Luckily, they will still have plenty of representation in Congress to try to impose their forced collapse of civilization onto the rest of us.
And therein lies the problem, spelled out simply and clearly.
>
Luckily, they will still have plenty of representation in Congress to try to impose their forced collapse of civilization onto the rest of us.
And therein lies the problem, spelled out simply and clearly.
the irony of california taking the same stance towards science as the medevials church when they said the earth was flat. as long as you censor all critics the earth will remain flat
the irony of california taking the same stance towards science as the medevials church when they said the earth was flat. as long as you censor all critics the earth will remain flat
Good because telling any patient that getting the jab is safe, is a lie. They better be telling their patients the truth.
Good because telling any patient that getting the jab is safe, is a lie. They better be telling their patients the truth.
First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature. CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the California Constitution.
Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?
>First and foremost, this is not a 1st Amendment issue. The 1st Amendment deals with the US Congress, not the CA legislature.
CA-specific speech rights are covered in Article 1 of the California Constitution.
Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?
Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?
Citizens can sue a state for violating rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If the state breaks federal law, citizens have that recourse. This instance (in the OP) is specifically a violation of the state constitution first.
>
Then how are people suing CA over 2a restrictions?
Citizens can sue a state for violating rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If the state breaks federal law, citizens have that recourse.
This instance (in the OP) is specifically a violation of the state constitution first.
Good. The faster the corrupt State that already sold most of it's Coast to China falls into disarray and falls into the Ocean, the better.
Good. The faster the corrupt State that already sold most of it's Coast to China falls into disarray and falls into the Ocean, the better.
(post is archived)