WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Take a look at the posts here and tell me you're going to compare the headlines for all of them with what was actually said or linked.

I call people's headlines out frequently but not enough to get more than a small % of the whole. This is quite different. This isn't editing a (((CNN))) headline to correctly apply meaning. This is intentionally editing a quote in a 14 second video to flip the meaning COMPLETELY opposite of what was actually stated.

Dude. It's not hard to grasp at all.

Correct and incorrect. No it's not hard to watch a 14 second video clip and see what (((OP))) is doing. Yes it is hard to grasp why the fuck it's being allowed to the detriment of poal. Your sub, sure. That's a garbage precedent to set.

e; Also I'm not asking you to check EVERY headline or post for accuracy. Not at all. HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.

[–] 0 pt

HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.

I disagree. It's my responsibility to review your comments and act according to site rules, not as your personal mod. I'm going to follow @AOU's advice and sticky comments calling out posts that are intentional rather than deleting them.

[–] 0 pt

It's my responsibility to review your comments and act according to site rules...

Which is what I'm asking.

not as your personal mod.

Which is not what I'm asking.