WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

That's what inflation is, after all. Consider two scenarios:

  1. You have $1,000 in the bank and the government takes $85 as tax, leaving you with $915.
  2. You have $1,000 in the bank and the government prints $85, making your $1,000 worth $915.

Using #2 is a little more sneaky because people don't make the direct connection, but the effect is identical.

That's what inflation is, after all. Consider two scenarios: 1. You have $1,000 in the bank and the government takes $85 as tax, leaving you with $915. 2. You have $1,000 in the bank and the government prints $85, making your $1,000 worth $915. Using #2 is a little more sneaky because people don't make the direct connection, but the effect is identical.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You have $1,000 in the bank and the government prints $85, making your $1,000 worth $915.

No. Doesn't work like that. To figure out the value of your $1000 in that scenario you need the total amount of dollars before the new printing and the total number of dollars after. So if there were $1,000,000 before and the (((fed))) printed $100,000 there would now be $1,100,000 in circulation. Your $1,000 would now be worth (1,000,000/1,100,000)*1000.

No this is not me defending jews or this jewish decision. It's not and you're a dumbass if you think it does. If you're going to argue you have to be correct about it. Any even minor inaccuracy will be used to hang you.

[–] 0 pt

No. Doesn't work like that. To figure out the value of your $1000 in that scenario you need the total amount of dollars before the new printing and the total number of dollars after.

In our example there are $1,000 in circulation. Printing $85 actually reduces the value of each dollar by only 7.8%, so the Fed can play the game a little more in reality. They can print $93 to have the same effect as taxing you $85 (remember their newly minted dollars are worth less, too).