Nope. None since McDonald. The (((news))) wants you to think it's something that SCOTUS has ruled on. Then when the ruling is made that's bad for the "gun" side they'll say it was a 2nd amendment loss. Even though a gun was only incidentally related.
Nope.
None since McDonald.
The (((news))) wants you to think it's something that SCOTUS has ruled on. Then when the ruling is made that's bad for the "gun" side they'll say it was a 2nd amendment loss. Even though a gun was only incidentally related.
(post is archived)