Why a ‘National Divorce’ Cannot Be Civil, but Would Inevitably Mean Civil War

Donate

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

•

Why a ‘National Divorce’ Cannot Be Civil, but Would Inevitably Mean Civil War (www.americanthinker.com)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (39).

[–] • 0 pt

You'd be shocked how much control a single, small, unknown, not important individual has. It all stems from language. Start expecting people to talk correctly to free their mind of jewish control.

parent
link

/s/USPolitics

created ago

About this sub

This is the sub for political news related to the United States.

Please don't submit screenshots, images of text, cartoons, and memes.

Posts without clear, accessible sources may be moved or deleted.

For political images, memes, and cartoons please use:

/s/PoliticalMemes
/s/PoliticalHumor
/s/PoliticalCartoons

For political videos, please use:

/s/PoliticalVideos

For original opinion and / or commentary, please use:

/s/PoliticalCommentary

For political satire:

/s/satire

Other politics-related sites you might enjoy:

/s/Politics
/s/WorldPolitics
/s/geopolitics

For Q stuff please use the Q-focused subs, such as:

/s/QStorm
/s/QPatriots
/s/QRP
/s/QMania
/s/Qtards

For Election-related stuff:

/s/ElectoralFraud
/s/Elections