If there was fraud, bring his evidence to court. Oh yeah, he tried that. Was it 150 cases thrown out? Remember the kraken? Lol, his supporters are beyond dumb. Don't worry, he'll be "reinstated" any day now
You might want to go seek help for your vaccine side effects. 🧠☠️⚰️
Not according to either the Constitution or historic precedent. If fraud is proven, then the best you can hope for is nullification. Reinstatement went out the window when Grandpa Badfinger swore in.
Historically, the closest thing to what we've got happened in the 1870s in the South, during Reconstruction. Elections at the County level were nullified and readministered by the military. I'm pretty sure if the same candidates were to run in a new election, administered by active duty, reserve and guard troops, it wouldn't end the way the last one did.
Well, fraud wasn't proven because it didn't happen and it was Trump himself calling to be reinstated. Read his joke of a statement
You don't understand how "evidence" in a court of law works. Evidence has to be "admitted". So if a faggot, democrat, lgbtq, blm, communist, antifa reprobate, degenerate, feminist, ugly, fat, judge refuses to allow it to be presented the media can then parrot "there was no evidence" LMFAO
I'm believing now - no fraud. There are 81 million people in America dumber than Biden. When you count the blacks, white women who should never have the right to vote, jews, people who can't fucking speak or read English, lazy white unemployed, fags...81 million votes...yep seems about right.
MSM refused to cover the evidence, courts were frightened away from hearing the evidence and reached for a procedural 'no standing' quickie to get it out of their court. Imagine that, the person that got the win has 'no standing', the voters who had their votes count for nothing due to fraud ballots entered into the contest had 'no standing'. Who does have standing if not the people directly harmed? That's what I 'd like to hear from those judges.
Why were the courts afraid?
That's what needs to be investigated. Have the judges explain who has standing if not the candidate and voters. If the judge has no answer then investigate it. All we get are law professors opining. Who do you think is harmed if not the candidate and the voters? The MSM? The tech companies? China? Who has standing? Who was harmed if not the candidate himself and the voters themselves? Is it right to have a harm for which there is NO remedy and the rules change on you only if it is YOU and not someone else?
Correct venue and standing are looked at first. Then the lawsuit proceeds. Who has standing? Just dems?
(post is archived)