I read that article and I noticed the entire time, it just called what Trump said anti-semitic but never offered any counter proof or reasons why Kushner was not more loyal to Isreal. They think that just merely pointing out that someone is or said something anti-semetic (a made up BS term in and of itself) that they've won an argument and thus they need not offer any more reasons or facts. The response to when someone says something is anti-semitic and then thinks they've won should be "ok, so what? Is that all you got?"