There is no rule of law when the law is subject to interpretation and the interpreters are intent to redefine words.
There is no rule of law when the law is subject to interpretation and the interpreters are intent to redefine words.
There is no rule of law when the law is subject to interpretation and the interpreters are intent to redefine words.
You're not suggesting that our esteemed Supreme Court Justices have stepped outside their purview, are you? :-)
>
There is no rule of law when the law is subject to interpretation and the interpreters are intent to redefine words.
You're not suggesting that our esteemed Supreme Court Justices have stepped outside their purview, are you?
:-)
"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
(post is archived)