It's likely that they'll produce quite a bit of 9-0 even if not all 9 agrees. They are trying to show the Dems that the court doesn't need to be packed. The Justice might be compromised operators, but they know that the Court will lose legitimacy and binding power if it gets packed. For example, I wouldn't expect Texas to abide by a packed SC for rulings they don't agree with.
It's likely that they'll produce quite a bit of 9-0 even if not all 9 agrees. They are trying to show the Dems that the court doesn't need to be packed. The Justice might be compromised operators, but they know that the Court will lose legitimacy and binding power if it gets packed. For example, I wouldn't expect Texas to abide by a packed SC for rulings they don't agree with.
Interesting point.
Interesting point.
(post is archived)